home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: Julian Reschke <reschke@GOEDEL.UNI-MUENSTER.DE>
- Subject: Re: xfs and such
- Date: Sun, 27 Feb 94 21:53:34 MET DST
- In-Reply-To: <9402260423.AA00596@jelal.north.de>; from "Juergen Lock" at Feb 26, 94 5:23 am
-
- >
- > hmm. well without (t)fork, execv etc and one global environment for
- > all processes i think i'd still have a hard time running un*x sources...
- > (or what about real tty devices? ptys? virtual consoles? networking?)
-
- First of all, most users just don't care. They want to run GEM apps in parallel
- and Mag!x does that very nicely.
-
- >
- > i guess if those people had put their work in improving MiNT instead of
- > reinventing it everyone would be better off now. oh well...
-
- Second, nobody gets paid for improving MiNT. And there *are* people who
- have to pay their bills, so they can't afoord to put their efforts into
- something like that. Besides, the AES too has to be improved.
-
- Go ahead and show me how you can persuade a user of GEM programs to run
- MTOS on his Mega STE with 2 MB, when he has seen Mag!x before :-)
-
- P.S.: There's no point in discussing this. I like MiNT, and I like Mag!x.
- Sometimes I run MiNT, sometimes MTOS, sometimes Mag!x. Sometimes even
- MTOS on top of Mag!x. Both systems are different, but for multitasking
- GEM applications, Mag!x really is more usable.
-
- --
- ---------------------------------------------------
- Julian F. Reschke, Hensenstr. 142, D-48161 Muenster
- eMail: reschke@math.uni-muenster.de jr@ms.maus.de
- ___________________________________________________
-